U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Harm Reduction and the Global Drug Control Regime: Contemporary Problems and Future Prospects

NCJ Number
208298
Journal
Drug and Alcohol Review Volume: 23 Issue: 4 Dated: December 2004 Pages: 483-489
Author(s)
David R. Bewley-Taylor
Editor(s)
John B. Saunders
Date Published
December 2004
Length
7 pages
Annotation
This paper examines the United Nations global drug control regime under the International Narcotics Control Board and the exploitation of this international drug control framework by various countries with harm-reduction policies.
Abstract
The current United Nations drug control system is based on three conventions (i.e., 1961, 1971, and 1988) and is dominated by the goal of a drug free world. In 1968, the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) was established. However, the INCB has no formal powers to enforce the implementation of the Convention provisions or punish parties for non-compliance. Due to this lack of power, several European states and other countries are exploiting the latitude which exists within the international framework and implementing or considering harm-reduction policies. The INCB has attempted unsuccessfully to counter its lack of formal powers by shaming governments into fulfilling its treaty obligations. A reassessment process of the drug control regime is recommended with the underlying theme that the nation states reclaim the control of domestic drug policies, which is currently limited by the global drug control regime and possess the freedom to develop pragmatic approaches best suited to the socioeconomic and cultural conditions within their own societies. However, when revisiting the Conventions with the possibility of change, the realities of international power politics and the mechanisms that exist for change within the global drug control regime must be understood and kept in mind. In conclusion, there appears to be a gradual change in system-wide attitudes towards harm reduction, with an accelerated acceptance. References