| NCJ Number: |
210956 |
| |
|
| Title: |
Suspect Prioritization in the Investigation of Sex Offences: From Clinical Classification and Profiling to Pragmatism (From Forensic Psychologist’s Casebook: Psychological Profiling and Criminal Investigation, P 68-89, 2005, Laurence Alison, ed,--See NCJ-210952) |
| |
|
| Author(s): |
Georgia Wilson; Laurence Alison |
| |
|
| Date Published: |
2005 |
| |
|
| Page Count: |
22 |
| |
|
| Sponsoring Agency: |
Willan Publishing
Portland, OR 97213-3644 |
| |
|
| Sale Source: |
Willan Publishing
c/o ISBS, 5804 N.E. Hassalo Street
Portland, OR 97213-3644
United States of America |
| |
|
| Publisher: |
http://www.isbs.com |
| |
|
| Type: |
Issue Overview |
| |
|
| Format: |
Book Chapter |
| |
|
| Language: |
English |
| |
|
| Country: |
United States of America |
| |
|
| Annotation: |
This chapter evaluates classification schemes for sexual offenders in terms of their usefulness for prioritizing suspects in the investigation of stranger sexual offenses. |
| |
|
| Abstract: |
Statistics from around the world have indicated that about half of all sexual offenses are committed by a stranger to the victim. Investigating stranger sexual offenses is particularly difficult; researchers have devised classification systems that attempt to differentiate between types of sexual offenders in order to inform offender treatment, risk of recidivism, and criminal justice decisionmaking. These classification systems can also be useful to police officers seeking to prioritize the field of suspects in stranger sexual offenses. The authors review and critique early clinical classification systems that displayed a lack of empiricism before turning their attention to Massachusetts Treatment Center (MTC) classifications, which they contend are empirical but are inappropriate for criminal investigative use. Criminal profiling within the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is similarly reviewed as showing progress but lacking in scientific rigor. An outcome of the criticisms leveled against FBI criminal profiling has been the development of two empirical techniques for criminal classifications: item-to-item correlation analysis and thematic behavioral analysis. Each of these is described and critiqued before the authors move on to a discussion of new approaches to suspect prioritization that are informed by the complementary frameworks of pragmatism and research in naturalistic decisionmaking. The difficulty of constructing offender classification systems that are useful to police investigations underscores the need for academics and practitioners to collaborate on the construction of offender classification systems. References |
| |
|
| Main Term(s): |
Offender classification; Offender profiles |
| |
|
| Index Term(s): |
Research design; Sex offender profiles; United Kingdom (UK); United States of America; US/foreign comparisons |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=210956 |
| |
|
. A title search of
WorldCat, the world's largest library network, will start when you click
"Continue." Here you will be able to learn if libraries in your community have the document you need. The results will open in a new browser and your NCJRS session will remain
active for 30 minutes. Learn More.
