U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Etiology of ACE-V and Its Proper Use: An Exploration of the Relationship Between ACE-V and the Scientific Method of Hypothesis Testing

NCJ Number
214613
Journal
Journal of Forensic Identification Volume: 56 Issue: 3 Dated: May/June 2006 Pages: 345-355
Author(s)
Michele Triplett; Lauren Cooney
Date Published
May 2006
Length
11 pages
Annotation
This article examines the relationship between the scientific methodology of ACE-V, used in the fingerprint community, and the scientific methodology of hypothesis testing and the correct usage of both methodologies.
Abstract
ACE-V is commonly described as the scientific methodology that fingerprint practitioners use to individualize friction skin impressions. Hypothesis testing is a scientific method for guiding scientific research and arriving at scientific conclusions. Because its use had become so common, hypothesis testing had become labeled by many as the “scientific method.” However, in 1998, the fingerprint community recognized the need to better articulate how they arrived at their conclusions and ACE-V gained widespread recognition. This paper shows hypothesis testing at its most basic level and how ACE-V is synonymous with hypothesis testing. Yet, when ACE-V is used inappropriately, errors in individualization can and will occur. ACE-V is a valid scientific method if it is used as a valid scientific method. The article examines the history of ACE-V, analyzes whether a clear understanding of ACE-V exists, gives a brief description of how ACE-V should be used, and the repercussions of incorrectly using ACE-V. Figures, references