skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 215062 Find in a Library
Title: Psychological Profiling of Australian Police Officers: A Longitudinal Examination of Post-Selection Performance
Journal: International Journal of Police Science & Management  Volume:8  Issue:2  Dated:Summer 2006  Pages:143-152
Author(s): Jonathan Lough; Michael Ryan
Date Published: 2006
Page Count: 10
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This study extends recent research (Lough and Ryan, 2005) on the performance of the Australian Institute of Forensic Psychology's (AIFP's) system for screening police applicants by examining the same two cohorts of Tasmanian police officers over a 2-year period, including data on notable on-the-record incidents.
Abstract: The study found that the group of officers assessed with detailed psychological profiling as part of their pre-employment testing consistently outperformed the group of officers who did not receive such screening; four of the differences in measures of objective performance were statistically significant. Also, the screened group had a lower drop-out rate, and they were less likely to make serious on-duty errors that resulted in formal action or investigation. These findings suggest that applicants selected under the AIFP psychological profiling system make better officers. These findings combined with those of the previous study indicate that the AIFP profiling system is a reliable means of selecting officers who will perform well and reliably over time. The AIFP system consists of six separate psychological tests and a subsequent structured interview. All of the components have been adapted for Australian conditions, have good reliability and validity, and reflect the norms for Australian policing. This study involved 213 officers who had served for 2 years after being selected under the AIFP system. The group of officers who were not screened under the AIFP system had been selected under the screening system used prior to AIFP screening. This group was evaluated according to performance criteria over the first 2 years of on-duty service. Performance was measured by sick days, stress claims, injury compensation claims, days off, substantiated complaints from the public, internal affairs investigations, and on-duty motor-vehicle accidents. 4 tables and 27 references
Main Term(s): Police personnel selection
Index Term(s): Australia; Foreign criminal justice research; Foreign police; Longitudinal studies; Performance Measures; Police performance evaluation; Psychological evaluation
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.