U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Appraising, Researching and Conceptualizing Criminal Thinking: A Personal View

NCJ Number
215229
Journal
Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health Volume: 16 Issue: 2 Dated: 2006 Pages: 87-99
Author(s)
Glenn D. Walters
Date Published
2006
Length
13 pages
Annotation
This paper reviews and summarizes theories, research, and practice on criminal thinking as it relates to the author's ongoing research on criminal thinking, with attention to topics that have shaped his personal views on criminal thinking.
Abstract
For the purpose of this discussion, "criminal thinking" is defined as "thought content and process conducive to the initiation and maintenance of habitual lawbreaking behavior." The paper first reviews three reliable and valid self-report measures of criminal thinking with ties to the three precursor models: differential association, neutralization, and criminal personality. The self-report instruments are the Criminal Sentiments Scale (CSS), the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS), and the Measures of Criminal Attitudes and Associates (MCAA). Future research should determine whether these instruments duplicate one another or measure distinctive characteristics or criminal thinking. While acknowledging that no single model of criminal thinking will satisfy all researchers and clinicians, the author outlines a model that he has found most helpful. It is based in the concept of "schemes," a term borrowed from Piaget (1977). A "scheme" is defined as a basic unit of meaning that underlies lifestyle. Schemes develop through a person's interactions with his/her environment. The childhood precursors of the crime scheme can be traced to a child's understanding of rules and rule-breaking and such fundamental schemes as perceptions of right and wrong. With experience and practice, these schemes become more precise, differentiated, and abstract. 1 figure and 59 references