skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 215915   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
  Title: Law Enforcement Response to Domestic Violence Calls for Service, Final Report
  Document URL: PDF 
  Author(s): Meg Townsend ; Dana Hunt ; Sarah Kuck ; Caity Baxter
  Date Published: 02/2005
  Page Count: 108
  Annotation: This study determined current written practices and procedures of law enforcement agencies across the Nation regarding their responses to domestic-violence calls for service.
  Abstract: Findings show that 77 percent of police departments have written procedures for responding to domestic-violence calls for service. Fifty-five percent of the departments have revised their initial policies, with most updating them to reflect changes in State law. Approximately 80 percent of the departments consider domestic relationships to include spouses, cohabitants, and parents of a common child. Departments were more likely to specify basic procedures on dispatching, questions to ask, and to prioritizing calls than to state procedures for interacting with victims. Most departments included procedures for arrests, handling violations of protection orders, and conducting on-scene investigations. There was some variation in what was required of call-takers in responding to emergency domestic-violence calls. Departments required officers to engage in a range of activities when dealing with victims and child witnesses of domestic violence. Also, most departments had procedures to increase officer accountability in responding to domestic-violence calls. More departments require officers to receive specialized domestic-violence training than require training for call-takers and dispatchers. Few departments had established domestic violence special units. Although many departments had partnerships with victim advocacy groups, few had advocates working within the department. Larger agencies were more likely to have a domestic-violence policy. The few agencies that included domestic-violence information on their Web sites emphasized services for victims and victim safety. This report identifies policy areas that require further consideration. These findings are based on a survey of a nationally representative sample of just over 14,000 law enforcement agencies nationwide, supplemented with findings from 9 interviews with community-based domestic-violence victim advocacy groups and focus studies with 3 law enforcement agencies. Extensive tabular data and appended survey questionnaire
  Main Term(s): Police policies and procedures
  Index Term(s): Police agencies ; Police management ; Domestic assault ; Police domestic violence training ; NIJ final report
  Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
  Grant Number: 99-C-008
  Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
  Type: Survey
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.