skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 216720 Find in a Library
Title: Predicting the Likelihood of Pretrial Re-Arrest for Violent Felony Offenses and Examining the Risk of Pretrial Failure Among New York City Defendants: An Analysis of the 2001 Dataset, Final Report
Author(s): Qudsia Siddiqi Ph.D.
Corporate Author: New York City Criminal Justice Agency, Inc
United States of America
Date Published: November 2006
Page Count: 117
Sponsoring Agency: New York City Criminal Justice Agency, Inc
New York, NY 10007
Sale Source: New York City Criminal Justice Agency, Inc
52 Duane Street, 3rd Floor
New York, NY 10007
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Performed in two phases, this analysis examined the likelihood of pretrial rearrest for violent felony offenses and developed models that would predict pretrial failure-to-appear (FTA) and/or rearrest among New York City defendants.
Abstract: Study findings suggest that although the current New York State statute does not permit the consideration of public safety in making pretrial release or decision decisions, New York City, Criminal Justice Agency’s (CJA’s) new release on recognizance (ROR) recommendation system would predict both pretrial failure-to-appear (FTA) and pretrial rearrest. It was expected that defendants considered low risk for FTA by the ROR system would also be low risk for pretrial rearrest. Highlights of findings include: (1) in examining violent felony rearrests, 10 percent of the defendants were rearrested for a violent felony offense; (2) defendants initially arrested for drug offenses were less likely to be rearrested for violent felony offenses; (3) younger defendants were more likely to be rearrested for violent felony offenses; and (4) rearrest, in general and rearrest for violent felony offenses are empirically distinct events and need to be addressed separately. Pretrial release programs, used as an alternative to the traditional bail system, have their roots in the bail reform movement dating back to the early 1960s. As more jurisdictions began to release defendants on their own recognizance, public safety concerns grew. CJA began a series of research projects to better understand pretrial recidivism. The project later shifted its focus on pretrial rearrests made for violent felony offenses and the prediction of pretrial failure which included pretrial FTA and rearrest. This report presents the findings in the exploration of both issues. The analysis was based on data collected in 2001 in two phases. Phase I examined the likelihood of pretrial rearrest for violent felony offenses and Phase II, the analytical phase, assessed the risk of pretrial failure, both FTA and rearrest. Tables, references, and appendixes A-D
Main Term(s): Pretrial release
Index Term(s): Bail/Financial Release; Crime prediction; Felony; New York; Pretrial procedures; Pretrial programs; Recidivism; Release on recognizance; Violent crimes
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.