skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 220181 Find in a Library
Title: Search Incident to Arrest in the Age of Personal Electronics
Journal: FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin  Volume:76  Issue:9  Dated:September 2007  Pages:26-32
Author(s): Michael J. Bulzomi J.D.
Date Published: September 2007
Page Count: 7
Document: HTML
Type: Instructional Material
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article discusses the scope of the legal authority of police officers to search electronic items in the arrestee's possession in the course of an arrest (e.g., cellular telephones, pagers, mp3 players, flash drives, personal digital assistants, and laptop computers).
Abstract: Over 30 years ago in United States v. Robinson, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the interests of officer safety and preservation of evidence outweigh an arrestee's privacy interests, which makes such searches reasonable under the fourth amendment; however, the Court has limited the search to the area where the arrestee could gain possession of a weapon or destroy evidence. This space is commonly called the "lunge" area. The search of this space is permitted even after the defendant is in handcuffs or officers have otherwise restricted the arrestee's movement. The Court further required that the search be conducted at the time of the arrest, meaning that any property removed from the "lunge space" for a later search for evidence requires a separate search warrant. Lower courts have addressed the lawful scope of the search incident to arrest with respect to electronic technology, relying upon "Robinson" to guide their determination of the reasonableness of police actions in retrieving stored information within devices carried by the arrestee. There is little doubt about the legality of searches of arrestee possessions when any evidence can be found in a relatively short period. The vastly different storage capacities of some electronic devices, however, may take days to examine their contents. Also, enhanced privacy protections, such as the use of passwords, should be considered when addressing the reasonableness of searching without a warrant. This article advises obtaining a warrant for searching electronic storage devices that contain massive amounts of information accompanied by privacy-protection devices. 27 notes
Main Term(s): Police legal training
Index Term(s): Arrest procedures; Computer evidence; Police legal limitations; Search and seizure training; Search warrants; US Supreme Court decisions; Warrantless search
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.