The study found that morality had stronger associations with measures of crime and withstood the influence of control variables better than the variable of self-control, such that morality seemed to be a general and key predictor of criminal conduct, even when self-control was taken into account. The findings provide weak support for the concept that self-control generally interacts with morality in determining whether or not people engage in crime/deviance. At best, the findings suggest that morality may influence the operation of self-control for some offense. For such offenses, morality has a greater chance of reducing crime as self-control increases. Study data were drawn from a random-sample household survey conducted in Lviv, Ukraine, in the fall of 2006. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 500 eligible adults from 150 households. In each household, one adult 18 years old or older was interviewed. Self-control was measured with a Grasmick et al. scale and a behavioral measure derived from reports of 10 "imprudent" behaviors that do not involve force or fraud for self-gratification. Respondents' moral judgments regarding specific acts were used to form a general measure of morality. As dependent variables, respondents provided self-reports on the commission of seven force and fraud offenses and their projection of their likelihood of performing them in the future. 3 tables and 71 references