skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 224521   Add to Shopping cart   Find in a Library
Title: Parole Violations and Revocations in California
Author(s): Ryken Grattet Ph.D. ; Joan Petersilia Ph.D. ; Jeffrey Lin Ph.D.
Date Published: 10/2008
Page Count: 150
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice
US Department of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2005-IJ-CX-0026
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/NCJRS
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America
Document: PDF 
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined parole violations and revocations in California based on tracking every adult on parole in the State at any point during the calendar years 2003 and 2004 (254,468 parolees responsible for 151,750 parole violations that involved a court or board hearing).
Abstract: The study found that the State has a high rate and volume of both parole violations and revocations, which is costly and contributes to prison overcrowding without improving public safety. For many offenders, parole supervision fails to disrupt the cycle of crime and imprisonment and offers little hope for behavioral change. There is evidence of significant progress and a willingness of State correctional leaders to reform the system; however, there are substantial organizational, political, and structural obstacles to the success of these efforts. This report discusses how the study’s key findings relate to specific policy initiatives, including several that are currently under consideration or being implemented. Proposals are to concentrate supervision and services in the first 6 months of parole; expand the use of early and earned parole discharge; match parolee risk and supervision levels; use a parole-violation decisionmaking matrix; expand options for intermediate sanctions; encourage criminal prosecution when new parolee felonies are alleged; track extra-level factors that impact revocation; and expand substance abuse and mental health programs for parolees. Recommendations are offered for future research. Chapter tables and figures, 51 references, and appended State mandatory referral policy for parole violations and supplementary information on the study’s statistical analyses
Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
Index Term(s): Cost effectiveness analysis ; Correctional reform ; Parole condition violations ; Parole casework ; Parole effectiveness ; Parole supervision ; NIJ final report ; California
   
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=246487

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.