skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 227952 Find in a Library
Title: Bounded Rationality of Identity Thieves: Using Offender-Based Research to Inform Policy
Journal: Criminology & Public Policy  Volume:8  Issue:2  Dated:May 2009  Pages:237-262
Author(s): Heith Copes; Lynne M. Vieraitis
Date Published: May 2009
Page Count: 26
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2005-IJ-CX-0012
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Based on data obtained from semistructured interviews with 59 inmates serving sentences in Federal prisons for identity theft, this study examined how offenders’ experiences and life circumstances influenced their assessments of risks and rewards in the course of deciding to engage in identity theft.
Abstract: The primary motivation for engaging in identity theft was money. The amount of profit gained from each identity theft varied according to the method used by an offender to convert a victim’s information into cash and/or goods and the financial status of the victim. Methods for using the victim’s information for personal gain included applying for credit cards in the victims’ names, opening new bank accounts and depositing counterfeit checks, withdrawing money from existing bank accounts, applying for loans, and applying for public assistance programs. The most lucrative form of identity theft involved mortgage loans; for example, some who were mortgage brokers used stolen identities to apply for mortgages on homes whose values had been inflated by an appraiser who was in on the scheme. They would then pay a “straw” borrower to get the loan using the stolen information. This yielded profits of hundreds of thousands of dollars. Regarding perceptions of the risks of identity theft, the identity thieves were apparently blinded to the risks of adverse consequences of their actions by their focus on the riches to be made. More than half of the identity thieves interviewed ignored the long-term consequences of their crimes. Many claimed that if thoughts of getting caught entered their minds, they were suppressed or minimized. In addition, they believed their schemes were so well-crafted that law enforcement agencies would not be able to identify their true identities and/or locations. Policy recommendations focus on interventions designed to change the way offenders think about their crimes. 59 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Criminal methods; Identity Theft; NIJ grant-related documents; Offender attitudes; Research uses in policymaking
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.