skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 228288 Find in a Library
Title: Conducted Energy Devices: Use in a Custodial Setting
Corporate Author: National Sheriffs' Association (NSA)
United States of America

Police Executive Research Forum (PERF)
United States of America
Project Director: Geislia Barnes
Date Published: 2009
Page Count: 36
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
Washington, DC 20531
National Sheriffs' Association (NSA)
Alexandria, VA 22314-3490
Police Executive Research Forum (PERF)
Washington, DC 20036
Sale Source: National Sheriffs' Association (NSA)
1450 Duke Street
Alexandria, VA 22314-3490
United States of America
Type: Guideline
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Based on a survey that determined sheriffs' office policies on the use of conducted energy devices (CEDs) in their custodial settings and the input of several committees of the National Sheriffs’ Association (NSA), the NSA presents a “Recommended General Order for Use of Conducted Energy Devices.”
Abstract: These guidelines for the use of CEDs in custodial settings provide protections designed to ensure that CEDs are used in custodial settings only by deputies who have been trained in their use. CEDs are to be used by these deputies only against subjects who make a sudden attack or offer active physical resistance. In making a decision about the use of a CED, deputies must consider the entire context of a situation, including factors such as the subject’s history of violence and whether bystanders are at risk. The recommended policies also call for caution and evaluation of other options before a CED is used against elderly subjects, women believed to be pregnant, and persons with apparent physical disabilities that impair their mobility. The recommended policies also require the reporting of CED activations and prohibit using CEDs as a form of punishment. The NSA envisions that continued research into CED use, such as the U.S. Department of Justice’s current study of the impact of CED use on officers and suspects, will inform the development of additional policies governing CED use. Out of the 345 sheriffs’ agencies sent the survey, 288 returned completed surveys. The survey contained a series of open-ended and closed-ended questions about agency personnel and its detention centers, followed by questions on the agency’s mission; the number of CED-type weapons possessed; when, where, and by whom the CED weapons are authorized to be deployed; the agency’s other policies regarding CED deployment; training in CED use; and lawsuits related to CED weapons. 2 references and appended questionnaire and cover letter
Main Term(s): Corrections policies
Index Term(s): Jail management; Jail standards; Less lethal technologies; Tasers
Note: Downloaded October 26, 2009
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.