skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 234803     Find in a Library
Title: Principles of Problem-Solving Justice
  Document URL: PDF 
Author(s): Robert V. Wolf
Corporate Author: Center for Court Innovation
United States of America
Date Published: 2007
Page Count: 16
  Annotation: This paper identifies and discusses the principles shared by domestic-violence, drug, and other problem-solving courts.
Abstract: The six principles discussed are based on the Center for Court Innovation’s experience in developing problem-solving initiatives in New York. One principle is better staff training in the particular issues and offenses with which the court deals (e.g., domestic violence or drug addiction), combined with better information on litigants, victims, and the community context of crime. Such improved knowledge can enhance the decisionmaking of judges, attorneys, and other justice officials regarding treatment needs and the risks individual defendants pose to public safety. A second principle pertains to community engagement. In developing a specialized approach to particular types of offenders and offenses, citizens and neighborhood groups have an important role to play in helping the justice system identify, prioritize, and solve local problems. A third principle is collaboration. Justice system leaders are uniquely positioned to engage a diverse range of people, government agencies, and community organizations in collaborative efforts to improve public safety. This can have the effect of expanding innovative responses to problems through innovative diversion and sentencing options. A fourth principle involves individualized justice. Using valid, evidence-based risk and needs assessment instruments, the justice system can solve problems by linking offenders to community-based services tailored to the needs and risks of the individual offender. A fifth principle concerns accountability. By insisting on regular and rigorous compliance monitoring and consequences for noncompliance, the justice system can improve offenders’ accountability for their behaviors. The sixth principle pertains to a focus on outcomes for the problem-solving process. Through the ongoing collection and analysis of data, outcomes (costs and benefits) can be measured in determining the effectiveness of operations and setting directions for continuous improvement in the justice system’s operation.
Main Term(s): Alternative court procedures
Index Term(s): Treatment offender matching ; Court personnel ; Court personnel educational programs ; Team diagnosis ; Court procedures ; Court personnel orientation ; BJA grant-related documents
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
United States of America
Grant Number: 2005-PP-CX-K008
Sale Source: Center for Court Innovation
520 Eighth Avenue, 18th Floor
New York, NY 10018
United States of America
Type: Issue Overview
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.