The study found that because specific questions about touch appear early in the BDF protocol, this procedure elicited more true reports than the open-ended questions in the standard protocol, but at the expense of a large increase in the number of suggested reports (children reporting what they believed the interviewer wanted to hear). Body diagrams also led some children to point to body parts that had not been touched or descried in the story; therefore, diagrams are more suggestive than questions alone, because children rarely acquiesce to initial yes-no questions that ask about novel (nonexperienced and nonsuggested ) touches. Also, yes-no questions rarely prompt children to describe events that are unrelated to information embedded in the questions. Due to the combination of suggested and spontaneous false reports in the BDF condition, calculations that assume two base rates of touching (5 percent and 80 percent touched children in the total sample) showed that accuracy differences would increasingly favor standard interviewing as the percentage of children in a sample who were touched increased. Unless subsequent research yields a different picture, these findings suggest that policymakers should place a moratorium on the practice of introducing body diagrams early in interviews. For this study, 261 children, 4-9 years old individually participated in science demonstrations during which half the children were touched two times. Months later, parents read stories to their children that described accurate and inaccurate information about the demonstrations. The stories for untouched children also contained inaccurate descriptions of touching. The children completed standard or BDF interviews, followed by source-monitoring questions. 2 tables and 32 references