U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Deferring to Clarity, Parsimony, and Evidence in Reply to Ward, Yates, and Willis

NCJ Number
237511
Journal
Criminal Justice and Behavior Volume: 39 Issue: 1 Dated: January 2012 Pages: 111-120
Author(s)
J. Stephen Wormith; Paul Gendreau; James Bonta
Date Published
January 2012
Length
10 pages
Annotation
This article is in response to criticism of an original article that that posed the question whether adding the "good lives" model (GLM) to crime prevention initiatives provides additional value over and above using interventions based on the "risk need responsivity" model (RNR).
Abstract
In response to published criticism, "The Good Lives Model and the Risk Need Responsivity Model: A Critical Response to Andres, Bonta, and Wormith" (NCJ 237510), the original article authors agree that both the GLM and RNR models have similarities and differences. In their rebuttal the authors focus on select, "important" themes; valued principles of science, parsimony, and how it relates to the comparison between RNR and GLM; and stress "let's consider the evidence" which they claim is not addressed by their critics. Table, figure and references