skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


NCJRS Abstract


Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
NCJ Number: NCJ 240697     Find in a Library
Title: Ballistic Body Armor: A Closer Look at the Follow-Up Inspection and Testing Program
  Document URL: HTML PDF 
Author(s): Michele R. Coppola
  Journal: NIJ Journal  Issue:271  Dated:February 2013  Pages:14 to 17
Date Published: 02/2013
Page Count: 4
  Annotation: This article discusses the follow-up inspection and testing program for use in ensuring that recently manufactured body armor meets the standards established by the National Institute of Justice.
Abstract: In July 2008, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) published its most recent set of standards for body armor: Ballistic Resistance of Body Armor, NIJ Standard-0101.06. These standards establish minimum performance requirements and test methods for determining the ballistic resistance of body armor designed to protect the torso against gunfire. This article discusses the NIJ Compliance Testing Program (CTP), a program in which manufacturers voluntarily submit equipment samples for testing by NIJ-approved laboratories to determine whether their particular model or models comply with a particular NIJ standard. The CTP contains two phases: phase 1 involves documenting the design of a particular model and testing 28 samples to verify that it meets the minimum standards; phase 2 involves subjecting new samples to additional ballistic testing and comparing the findings to those from phase 1, ensuring consistent production of the body armor. The article also discusses the results of follow-up inspections that were conducted between September 2010 and August 2012. To date, these follow-up inspections have found eight body armor models that have had major variations in construction that could affect ballistic performance. Proposed changes to the program are discussed.
Main Term(s): Body armor/Personal protective equipment
Index Term(s): Protective shields ; Ballistics ; Standards ; Protective equipment ; Criminal justice standards
Type: Best Practice/State-of-the-Art Review
Country: United States of America
Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.