skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 242173 
Title: Mostly Unintended Effects of Mandatory Penalties: Two Centuries of Consistent Findings (From Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Volume 38, P 65-114, 2009, Michael Tonry, ed., - See NCJ-242171)
Author(s): Michael Tonry
Date Published: 2009
Page Count: 50
Sponsoring Agency: University of Chicago Press
Chicago, IL 60637
Sale Source: University of Chicago Press
1427 East 60th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States of America
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Book Chapter
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This essay summarizes research on the implementation, operation, and deterrent effects of mandatory sentencing laws.
Abstract: Policy and knowledge concerning mandatory minimum sentences have long marched in different directions in the United States. There is no credible evidence that the enactment or implementation of such sentences has significant deterrent effects, but there is massive evidence, which has accumulated for two centuries, that mandatory minimums foster circumvention by judges, juries, and prosecutors; reduce accountability and transparency; produce injustices in many cases; and result in wide unwarranted disparities in the handling of similar cases. No country besides the United States has adopted many mandatory penalty laws, and none has adopted laws as severe as those in the United States. If policymakers took account of research evidence and informed practitioners’ views, existing laws would be repealed and no new ones would be enacted. (Published Abstract)
Main Term(s): Mandatory Sentencing
Index Term(s): Deterrence; Deterrence effectiveness; Sentencing disparity; Sentencing guidelines; Sentencing reform; Sentencing trends; Sentencing/Sanctions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.