skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 243819 Find in a Library
Title: Effectiveness of Public Defenders in Four Florida Counties
Journal: Journal of Criminal Justice  Volume:41  Issue:4  Dated:July - August 2013  Pages:205-212
Author(s): Marian R. Williams
Date Published: August 2013
Page Count: 8
Publisher: http://www.elsevier.com 
Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the association between type of attorney (public defender or private attorney) representing defendants and case outcomes, building upon recent studies in Florida (Williams, 2002) and Illinois (Hartley, Miller, & Spohn, 2010).
Abstract: Regarding pretrial decisions, defendants with public defenders were less likely to have their charges dismissed; however, there was no link between type of attorney and whether or not bail was offered to defendants. In addition, defendants with public defenders were more likely to be detained pretrial. Regarding variables related to conviction outcomes, there was no relationship between type of attorney and the likelihood of reducing a charge to a misdemeanor; however, only a small percentage of defendants had their charges reduced to a misdemeanor (7.9 percent). Neither was there a relationship between type of attorney and the likelihood of a prison sentence; and if sentenced to prison, the length of the sentence was not associated with type of attorney. As for the control variables in the analyses of conviction variables, results were similar to the ones found for the pre-conviction (pretrial) analyses; i.e., legal factors such as prior convictions and status at the time of arrest had a role in convictions, but so did the extra-legal factor of gender. Apparently, females are treated more leniently than males even in the era of sentencing guidelines. The current study assessed the effectiveness of public defenders in Florida. Data were obtained from the Bureau of Justice Statistics State Court Processing Statistics, 1990-2006: Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties Provided by the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research. The data contain information for felony cases filed in 40 of the 75 most populous counties in the United States; 4 Florida counties were included in the study. 3 tables and 55 references
Main Term(s): Court management
Index Term(s): Bail/Financial Release; Comparative analysis; Convictions; Defense counsel; Defense counsel effectiveness; Defense services; Incarceration; Pretrial detention; Public defenders; Right to counsel; Sentencing factors
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=265896

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.