skip navigation

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

  NCJ Number: NCJ 244149     Find in a Library
  Title: Through Their Eyes: How Prisoners Make Sense of Their Incarceration
  Document URL: HTML HTML (ePub) HTML (MOBI) PDF 
  Author(s): Nadine Frederique ; Lori Sexton
  Journal: National Institute of Justice Journal  Issue:273  Dated:March 2014  Pages:60 to 65
  Date Published: 03/2014
  Page Count: 6
  Series: NIJ Journal
  Annotation: This article reports on a research project partially funded by the National Institute of Justice (NIJ), in which the researcher interviewed 80 male and female inmates about their subjective experience and interpretation of punishment in 3 Ohio State prisons.
  Abstract: Nearly all the prisoners agreed that being in prison is in itself a large part of their punishment. In addition, symbolic punishments were identified: the losses of autonomy and a sense of self as a person; as well as the loss of family; all of which are related to their loss of freedom. The study also examined how the experience of punishment varied, using two dimensions that arose from the data: severity (the punishment’s intensity as experienced by prisoners) and salience (the importance of punishment in the minds and lives of prisoners). An analysis of the interaction of severity and salience revealed four narratives of penal consciousness. These four narratives are “punishment as part of life;” “punishment as a separate life;” “punishment as suspension of life;” and “punishment as death.” Some prisoners may experience more than one narrative at the same time. The prison environment influenced penal consciousness in various ways. Direct supervision is designed to be a humane and humanizing form of incarceration that includes housing units with cells arranged around a common dayroom; commercial-grade fixtures inside cells and common areas; and amenities such as televisions, games, kitchen appliances, and do-it-yourself laundry. Prisoners under direct supervision tended to experience punishment as part of life and as a separate life. Both were associated with low-severity punishment. This contrasted with prisoners under indirect supervision, which involves traditional linear-style cellblocks. These inmates tended to experience punishment as suspension of life and punishment as death. Female inmates tended to lament the lack of consistency and routine in prison. 2 notes
  Main Term(s): Corrections management
  Index Term(s): Punishment ; Inmate attitudes ; Self concept ; Prison conditions ; Ohio
  Grant Number: 2010-IJ-CX-0002
  Type: Report (Study/Research) ; Research (Applied/Empirical)
  Country: United States of America
  Language: English
  To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.