skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 247570 Find in a Library
Title: Application of Proteinases for DNA Isolation of Challenged Bone Specimens
Author(s): Richard Li; Lidissy Liriano; Stacey Klempner; Yessica Saenz; Danequa Carter
Date Published: 2014
Page Count: 30
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Grant Number: 2009-DN-BX-K209
Sale Source: NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Given the need for a less labor-intensive and time-consuming method for cleaning bone specimens prior to DNA isolation, this study compared two methods for processing bone specimens prior to DNA isolation: mechanical sanding and cleaning the bone with enzymatic trypsin.
Abstract: This study found that cleaning the bone with the trypsin method is a useful alternative to mechanical cleaning methods. Multiple samples can be processed simultaneously, which can expedite the identification of victims of a mass disaster through the DNA analysis of skeletal remains. Comparable values of DNA yields were observed with both mechanical sanding and the trypsin method. In order to assess the integrity of the nuclear DNA isolated, the number of allele calls and the peak-height values of alleles of the short tandem repeat profiles were compared between the two methods. Comparable levels of amplification success of mitochondrial DNA fragments were observed between the two methods. A paired-sample t-test found no significant difference between the two methods. In addition to providing a more efficient method for cleaning bone prior to DNA analysis, the trypsin cleaning method may have a low risk of cross-contamination between samples from airborne bone dust produced by mechanical cleaning. The risk for blood-borne pathogens that may be carried by exposure to bone powder dust is also reduced with the trypsin method. Bone specimens were selected to represent a variety of bone quality and types of bones. A pair of bone fragments was then processed using the sanding and trypsin methods separately for pair-wise comparisons. 7 figures, 4 tables, and 24 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Bone analysis; DNA contamination; DNA extraction; DNA Typing; Forensic sciences; Investigative techniques; NIJ grant-related documents; Victim identification
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.