skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 250937 Find in a Library
Title: Assessing the Impact of South Carolina's Parole and Probation Reforms: Justice Reinvestment Initiative
Author(s): Elizabeth Pelletier; Bryce Peterson; Ryan King
Corporate Author: The Urban Institute
United States of America
Date Published: April 2017
Page Count: 13
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
Washington, DC 20531
The Urban Institute
Washington, DC 20037
Grant Number: 2015-ZB-BX-K005
Sale Source: The Urban Institute
2100 M Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis; Program/Project Description; Program/Project Evaluation; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined the effectiveness of South Carolina’s policy of using administrative responses to parole and probation violations instead of incarcerating people for violating the terms of their supervision.
Abstract: This policy was part of a broader effort to reduce a rapidly growing prison population with attendant costs that strained the State’s budget. After controlling for demographic and case-specific variables and the number of administrative responses to violations given, people who began their supervision after the implementation of the policy were less likely to be incarcerated than people in supervision before the policy was implemented. Because of limitations in data availability, however, the study was only able to examine how many administrative responses people received while on supervision but not how many supervision violations occurred or what responses were used for specific violations. The researchers recommend that South Carolina invest in the implementation of supervision reforms and develop a more standardized system that encourages evidence-based supervision practices. They also recommend that the State focus on performance measurement and improving data collection. Better data on supervision violations, agent responses, and outcomes will enable the State to be more precise in evaluating the effectiveness of its reforms and track progress over time. 4 figures, 2 tables , and 6 references
Main Term(s): Correctional reform
Index Term(s): Alternatives to Incarceration; BJA Grant-related Documents; BJA Resources; Corrections effectiveness; Parole effectiveness; Parole violations; Prison overcrowding; Probation effectiveness; Probation violations; South Carolina
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.