U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - COURT-ORDERED, SURGICAL REMOVAL OF BULLET FROM ACCUSED IS NOT UNREASONABLE SEARCH AND SEIZURE UNDER THE 4TH AMENDMENT WHERE LEGAL AND MEDICAL SAFEGUARDS PROVIDE SUFFICIENT PROTECTION

NCJ Number
39593
Journal
Temple Law Quarterly Volume: 50 Issue: 1 Dated: (1976) Pages: 164-176
Author(s)
L R BARRON
Date Published
1976
Length
13 pages
Annotation
ARTICLE DISCUSSES AN APPELLATE COURT RULING ON FOURTH AMENDMENT PROVISIONS AGAINST UNREASONABLE SEARCH AND SEIZURE IN RELATION TO A COURT-ORDERED BODILY INTRUSION CASE.
Abstract
IN UNITED STATES V. CROWDER, THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPELLATE COURT RULED THAT REMOVAL OF A POSSIBLY INCRIMINATING BULLET FROM A SUSPECT'S ARM COULD NOT BE PREVENTED BY CITING AMENDMENT SAFEGUARDS. THE CASE INVOLVED A WOUNDED ROBERY AND MURDER SUSPECT WHO WAS BELIEVED TO HAVE BEEN SHOT IN THE ARM BY THE VICTIM BEFORE HE DIED. THE AUTHOR EXAMINES THE RELEVANT CASE LAW TO FIND A PRECEDENT IN THE APPELLATE COURT'S DECISION....BS

Downloads

No download available

Availability