U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATION AND PROSPECTS FOR REFORM (IN CANADA AND CERTAIN OTHER SELECTED COUNTRIES) JUDICIAL TRAINING AND METHODS OF SELECTION

NCJ Number
40168
Author(s)
J DEMONTIGNY; J ROBERT
Date Published
1973
Length
196 pages
Annotation
THIS REPORT DESCRIBES THE PROCEDURES FOR THE SELECTION AND TRAINING OF JUDGES IN FRANCE, GREAT BRITAIN, AND THE UNITED STATES, COMPARES TO THOSE UTILIZED IN QUEBEC, AND SUGGESTS REFORMS IN THE CANADIAN SYSTEMS.
Abstract
THERE IS NO FORMAL TRAINING FOR JUDGES IN THE UNITED STATES, SINCE IT IS GENERALLY BELIEVED THAT THE EXPERIENCE GAINED AS A PRACTICING ATTORNEY IS SUFFICIENT PREPARATION. IN GREAT BRITAIN, JUDGES ARE SELECTED FROM AMONG THE PROFESSIONAL RANKS OF BARRISTERS (AS OPPOSED TO SOLICITORS), WHILE UNDER THE FRENCH SYSTEM, JUDICIAL CANDIDATES ARE CHOSEN FROM THE GRADUATES OF A SPECIAL NATIONAL SCHOOL FOR JUDICIAL TRAINING. THE CREATION OF A SCHOOL, SIMILAR TO FRENCH NATIONAL INSTITUTE IS SUGGESTED TO REPLACE QUEBEC'S EXISTING SYSTEM OF JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION, WHICH ONLY REQUIRES 10 YEARS' EXPERIENCE AS A PRACTICING ATTORNEY FOR ANY JUDICIAL CANDIDATE. THE UNITED STATES SYSTEM OF MERIT SELECTION OF JUDGES IS RECOMMENDED AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO QUEBEC'S EXISTING METHOD OF HAVING CANDIDATES SELECTED BY THE PROVINCIAL CABINET AND APPOINTED BY THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OR GOVERNOR. --IN FRENCH...ELW