Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

1 record(s) found

NCJ Number:	48426

Title:	SPEEDY TRIAL, CHAPTER 12 - 2ND ED. - TENTATIVE DRAFT

Author(s):	ANON

Date Published:	1978

Annotation:	THE TRIAL CALENDAR, DETERMINING WHAT IS A SPEEDY TRIAL, SPECIAL PROCEDURES FOR PERSONS SERVING TERMS OF IMPRISONMENT, AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF DENIAL OF SPEEDY TRIAL ARE COVERED IN THESE DRAFT STANDARDS.

Abstract:	THESE DRAFTS FOR A SECOND EDITION OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION'S 'STANDARDS RELATING TO THE ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE' CONTAIN ONLY MINOR REVISIONS. (THE FIRST EDITION WAS PUBLISHED OVER THE PERIOD 1968-1973.) THE PRINCIPLES UNDERLYING MOST OF THESE STANDARDS ARE THE PROTECTION OF THE DEFENDANT, WHO OTHERWISE WOULD NOT BE IN A POSITION TO FORCE A PROMPT TRIAL, AND PROTECTION OF THE PUBLIC INTEREST. TOPICS COVERED INCLUDE SCHEDULING OF CRIMINAL CASES, PREFERENTIAL SCHEDULING OF CASES IN WHICH THE DEFENDANT HAS BEEN DETAINED IN CUSTODY, JUDICIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR SCHEDULING, THE NEED TO SET SPECIFIC SPEEDY TRIAL TIME LIMITS IN STATE LAW, FIGURING TIME LIMITS FOR TRIAL, AND EXCLUDED TIME. WHEN THE TRIAL INVOLVES A PERSON IMPRISONED WITHIN OR WITHOUT THE JURISDICTION, THE PROSECUTOR HAS AN OBLIGATION TO OBTAIN THE PRESENCE OF THE PRISONER, FILE A DETAINER, OR OTHERWISE MAKE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO ENSURE THE DEFENDANT'S PRESENCE. IF A DEFENDANT IS NOT BROUGHT TO TRIAL BEFORE THE TIME LIMIT HAS ELAPSED, THE CONSEQUENCE SHOULD BE ABSOLUTE DISCHARGE. FAILURE OF THE DEFENDANT OR DEFENDANT'S COUNSEL TO MOVE FOR DISCHARGE PRIOR TO TRIAL OR ENTRY OF A PLEA OF GUILTY SHOULD CONSTITUTE WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO SPEEDY TRIAL. RELEASE ON RECOGNIZANCE IS ALSO COVERED. EACH STANDARD IS FOLLOWED BY A LIST OF CHANGES SINCE THE FIRST STANDARDS WERE ISSUED, A LISTING OF RELATED STANDARDS, AND A COMMENTARY. THE COMMENTARIES ARE HEAVILY FOOTNOTED. (GLR)

Index Term(s):	American Bar Association (ABA); Court case flow management; Court delays; Detainers; Judicial process; Right to speedy trial; Standards

Grant Number:	77-DF-99-0012

Sponsoring Agency:	American Bar Assoc. Washington, DC 20036 US Dept of Justice Washington, DC 20531

Corporate Author:	American Bar Assoc. United States of America

Page Count:	23

Format:	Document

Language:	English

Country:	United States of America

Note:	AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS RELATING TO THE ADMINISTRATION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE



	To cite this abstract, use the following link: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=48426

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

Find in a Library