THE TEAM CONDUCTED ONSITE VISITS TO DISCUSS JURY MANAGEMENT NEEDS AND ALTERNATIVES WITH CIRCUIT COURT AND COUNTY OFFICALS AND PREPARED A REPORT CONTAINING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMMEDIATE AND LONG-RANGE ACTIONS. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMMEDIATE ACTION INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING: (1) THE GREENVILLE COUNTY COURT SYSTEM SHOULD IMPLEMENT THE CONCEPT OF JURY POOLING SINCE THE EXISTING SYSTEM OF CALLING INDIVIDUAL PANELS OF JURORS FOR EACH COURT APPEARS TO BE INEFFICIENT; (2) A JURY ASSEMBLY AREA SHOULD BE DEVELOPED IN THE COUNTY COURTHOUSE; (3) BECAUSE THERE IS NO CONSISTENT COMMUNICATION LINK BETWEEN JURORS AND COURTS, A FULL-TIME JURY COORDINATOR SHOULD BE DESIGNATED; (4) FORMS SENT TO PROSPECTIVE JURORS SHOULD BE REVISED TO ELIMINATE MISUNDERSTANDING; (5) JURORS SHOULD BE INSTRUCTED TO REPORT EARLIER SO THAT QUALIFICATION AND ORIENTATION PROCEDURES ARE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE OPENING OF COURT; (6) THE QUALIFICATION PROCESS FOR JURORS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED BY THE JURY COORDINATOR RATHER THAN BY A JUDGE; (7) AUDIOVISUAL MATERIALS SHOULD BE EMPLOYED TO PROVIDE ORIENTATION INFORMATION TO JURORS; AND (8) A DATA COLLECTION SYSTEM FOR JURY MANAGEMENT SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED SO THAT THE SUMMONS RETURN CAN BE ELIMINATED. LONG-RANGE OBJECTIVES/RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERN THE REVIEW OF ALL LAWS ABOUT JURY MANAGEMENT, THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AN AUTOMATED JURY SELECTION AND SUMMONING SYSTEM, AND ONE DAY/ONE TRIAL JURY SERVICE. JUROR SUMMONS FORMS ARE INCLUDED, AND DETAILED INFORMATION ON EFFICIENT JURY MANAGEMENT IN SMALL COURTS IS CONTAINED IN AN APPENDIX. (DEP)