skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 62459 Find in a Library
Title: TWO CLASSES OF ACCUSED - A STUDY OF BAIL AND DETENTION IN AMERICAN JUSTICE
Author(s): J S GOLDKAMP
Corporate Author: Ballinger Publishing Co
United States of America
Date Published: 1979
Page Count: 279
Sponsoring Agency: Ballinger Publishing Co
Cambridge, MA 02138
Sale Source: Ballinger Publishing Co
Harvard Square
17 Dunster Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A STUDY IS PRESENTED WHICH EXAMINES THE IDEOLOGICAL ORIGINS OF BAIL PRACTICES TO DETERMINE HOW BAIL SHOULD BE DECIDED; THE STATE OF EMPIRICAL KNOWLEDGE REGARDING BAIL PRACTICE IS ASSESSED.
Abstract: THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF THE STUDY INVOLVES REVIEWING DIVERSE SOURCES OF LEGAL POLICY SUCH AS THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, CASE LAW, THE BAIL REFORM ACT, ADVISORY STANDARDS, AND BAIL GUIDELINES. RESULTS OF EARLIER STUDIES FOCUSING ON BAIL ARE CRITICALLY REVIEWED. EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BAIL DECISION PROCESS, INCLUDING COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DETAINED VERSUS RELEASED DEFENDANTS IS PRESENTED. OF MAJOR INTEREST IN THE EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS STAGE ARE THE RESULTS OF A CASE STUDY OF BAIL DECISIONMAKING AND THE DETERMINATION OF PRETRIAL CUSTODY IN PHILADELPHIA. THE LARGE URBAN JURISDICTION WAS SELECTED TO NARROW THE STUDY FROM LEGAL GENERALITIES TO SPECIFIC BAIL PROCESS WORKINGS. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY SITE, STRUCTURAL FEATURES OF THE PHILADELPHIA JUDICIAL SYSTEM, AND THE SAMPLE DESIGN ARE DESCRIBED. BASED ON KNOWLEDGE OF THE DETERMINANTS OF BAIL AND CUSTODY, INFERENCES CONCERN THE NATURE OF THE ROLE OF PRETRIAL DETENTION. USING THE PHILADELPHIA DATA, THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRETRIAL CUSTODY AND LATER OUTCOMES IN DEFENDANTS' CASES IS EXAMINED, AND CONCLUSIONS ARE MADE REGARDING THE BAIL SYSTEM. THE BAIL SYSTEM IS FOUNDERING IN IDEOLOGICAL AMBIGUITY AND IN OPERATIONAL SELF-CONTRADICTION. BAIL DECISION DEFIES OPEN SCRUTINY AND THE GOALS OF THE BAIL DECISION ARE NOT CLEARLY OR AUTHORITATIVELY ARTICULATED. CRITERIA RELIED ON IN THE BAIL DECISION ARE ABSENT, POORLY DEFINED, CONFUSING, OR EVEN INEFFECTIVE. OUTCOMES MAY BE FREQUENTLY INADVERTENT, ESPECIALLY TO THE EXTENT THAT RELEASE OR DETENTION IS DETERMINED BY THE DEFENDANT'S ABILITY TO RAISE CASH. THE STUDY QUESTIONS THE ADEQUATE REPRESENTATION OF BOTH THE UNITED STATES AND THE ACCUSED, CONSIDERING CURRENT BAIL PRACTICES. STATISTICAL TABULAR DATA, FIGURES, REFERENCES, APPENDIXES, AND AN INDEX ARE INCLUDED IN THE STUDY. (LWM)
Index Term(s): Bail discrimination; Bail reform; Bail/Financial Release; Decisionmaking; Detention; Federal Bail Reform Act; Federal bail system; Pennsylvania; Presentence studies; Pretrial procedures; Studies
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=62459

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.