THIS STUDY EXAMINED CONTESTED TRIALS SELECTED OUT OF A SAMPLE OF 500. EACH DEFENDANT WHO HAD PLEADED NOT GUILTY WAS INTERVIEWED. OF THOSE INTERVIEWED, 129 WERE ACQUITTED IN THE INSTANT CASE AND SLIGHTLY MORE THAN A THIRD OF THIS GROUP HAD NO PRIOR CRIMINAL RECORD. DETAILS WERE ALSO SOUGHT IN THE INTERVIEWS OF DEFENDANTS DID NOT MAKE ANY REQUEST TO SEE A LAWYER, AND OF THOSE WHO DID, OVER THREE-QUARTERS HAD THEIR REQUESTS REJECTED BY THE POLICE. THE MOST STRKING FINDING TO EMERGE WAS THAT FEWER THAN 1 IN 10 DEFENDANTS WERE INTERROGATED BY THE POLICE IN THE PRESENCE OF A SOLICITOR. MANY WERE UNAWARE OF THEIR RIGHT TO CONSULT A LAWYER. OTHERS SAID THEY MADE NO REQUEST TO SEE A LAWYER BECAUSE THEY WERE INNOCENT AND THOUGHT NO CHARGES WOULD BE PREFERRED AGAINST THEM. A FINAL GROUP WERE AWARE OF THEIR LEGAL RIGHTS, YET FELT IT WAS POINTLESS TO ASK FOR A LAWYER BECAUSE THEY BELIEVED THE REQUEST WOULD BE REFUSED. INTERVIEWS WITH POLICE OFFICERS IN CHARGE OF THE 500 CASES REVEALED MASSIVE ANTIPATHY TOWARDS HAVING LAWYERS PRESENT WHEN DEFENDANTS WERE FIRST INTERVIEWED. OF THE 32 DEFENDANTS WHO HAD A LAWYER PRESENT WHILE IN POLICE CUSTODY, 20 WERE NONETHELESS CONVICTED AT TRIAL. THE RESEARCH SUGGESTS THAT, IF EVIDENCE IN A TRIAL CANNOT BE VALIDATED, IT CANNOT BE RELIABLE. THERE ARE MANY WAYS OF ENSURING THAT EVIDENCE IS RELIABLE APART FROM HAVING LAWYERS AT THE TRIAL, AND URGENT CONSIDERATION MUST BE GIVEN TO THESE. A THOROUGH OVERHAUL AND MORE DETAILED SCRUTINY OF CURRENT PRACTICES ARE URGENTLY CALLED FOR. FOOTNOTES ARE GIVEN. (MJW) URGENT CONSIDERATION MUST BE GIVEN TO THESE. A THOROUGH OVERHAUL AND MORE DETAILED SCRUTINY OF CURRENT PRACTICES ARE URGENTLY CALLED FOR. FOOTNOTES ARE GIVEN. (MJW)