U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Does Community Corrections Make a Difference - An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Community Corrections in Colorado

NCJ Number
74713
Author(s)
L A Winterfield
Date Published
1980
Length
291 pages
Annotation
Colorado's community corrections programs were evaluated during fiscal year 1978-79 to assess ability to help clients build positive bonds to the conventional social order.
Abstract
Case files were examined to gather information on 776 cases involved in postconviction diversion and postincarceration transition. Positive bonding with the conventional social order was measured in terms of increasing educational and occupational status, gaining employment, and decreasing drug and alcohol problems. Using bonding theory as developed by Elliott and others, it was hypothesized that if community corrections treatment could increase positive bonding, recidivism would decrease. Results indicated that while positive bonding was related to decreased recidivism, community corrections treatment was not consistently related to increasing positive bonds. About one-third of the clients who started treatment was the one which began with low bonds; about half of this group improved during community corrections treatment. The group which responded most favorably to treatment was the one which began with low bonds; about half of this group improved during community corrections treatment. This outcome probably occurred due to the increase in surveillance involved in community corrections. Bonding theory's implications for criminal justice approaches are valid, but community corrections is not now totally successful in strengthening bonds with the conventional social order. Sentencing of only those clients who are truly in need of more intensive services to community corrections should improve the success of this treatment alternative. A literature review, tabular and graphic data, 84 references, a glossary of abbreviations used for computer analyses, and extensive appendixes presenting additional findings and coding forms are provided. (Author abstract modified)