U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Automobile Repair Report

NCJ Number
76314
Date Published
1980
Length
32 pages
Annotation
This report summarizes the findings of hearings held by South Carolina's Department of Consumer Affairs in 1979 on automobile repairs and maintenance, as well as a review of legal regulations covering the auto repair industry.
Abstract
The testimony of 130 witnesses during 2 days of hearings revealed substantial problems facing consumers of auto repair services. Most complaints were not caused by overt fraud but were attributed to lack of communication between the consumer and large repair facilities; consumers' ignorance about car maintenance; and failure of the auto repair industry to tell the customer about costs, type of work performed, and replacement parts. Other barriers to public confidence in the auto repair industry include lack of established standards governing the quality of auto mechanics and repair shops and ambiguous provisions in new car warranties. While most complaints heared at the auto repair hearings could have been resolved through mediation, no mechanism of any significance has been provided by the auto repair industry for prompt and efficient response to consumer complaints. As of mid-1979, 25 States and the District of Columbia had passed legislation affecting the auto repair business. The most common form of regulation mandates disclosure of detailed information to consumers entering auto repair transactions. Only a few States license auto repair businesses and require mechanic certification. Although Federal agencies have conducted studies which document widespread consumer dissatisfaction with auto repairs, no Federal regulations of the industry exist at present. South Carolina has no laws specifically targeted at the auto repair industry, although the Unfair Trade Practices Act and the Uniform Commercial Code could be used to redress some complaints. A California statute involving disclosure, dispute mediation, and licensing appears to be effective but also has created a large bureaucracy. Massachusetts has avoided this problem by listing auto repair practices which are violations of the State's Unfair Trade Practices Act and placing enforcement responsibilities within the Attorney General's Office, Division of Consumer Protection. General recommendations resulting from the hearings and a table showing different types of complaints described at the hearings are included.