skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 77326 Find in a Library
Title: Trial of Juveniles in Adult Court - The Prosecutor's Perspective (From Major Issues in Juvenile Justice Information and Training - Readings in Public Policy, P 321-332, 1981, John C Hall et al, ed. - See NCJ-77318)
Author(s): A R Grundfest; A C Paskow; H E Szabo; R J Williams
Date Published: 1981
Page Count: 12
Sponsoring Agency: Academy for Contemporary Problems
Sale Source: Academy for Contemporary Problems
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The role of the prosecutor in the determination to try specific youths in the juvenile or adult court is examined.
Abstract: Although practices are now changing, historically prosecutors have generally not taken part in decisions involving juvenile court waiver. Juvenile courts have gradually changed from a primary emphasis on rehabilitation to increased formalization and more adversarial proceedings. The presence of defense counsel is not often mandatory, and the judge's role has shifted to the more traditional one of arbiter of facts. As a corollary, the prosecutor's participation has become essential. Nowhere is the prosecutor's role more vital than in the important decision concerning the proper forum for the trial of youths. The fundamental decision whether to try a youth as a juvenile or an adult can be the most important determination to be made in handling youthful criminality. Choice of the proper forum is essential for preserving the juvenile court system's effective functioning and keeping it available only for those still able to benefit from its services. Waiver also most effectively protects society by subjecting dangerous youthful offenders to the full rigors of the adult criminal justice system. Because of the growing adversarial nature of juvenile court proceedings, coupled with prosecutors' unique position in the entire criminal justice system and their assigned role in safeguarding the public welfare, prosecutors must have vigorous participation in the determination of the forum in which a case is handled. Footnotes are provided. (Author abstract modified)
Index Term(s): Decisionmaking; Discretionary decisions; Juvenile court waiver; Prosecutorial discretion; Prosecutors
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.