skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 78195 Find in a Library
Title: Meeting Defenses (From Trial Techniques - A Compendium of Course Materials, P 141-194, 1980 - See NCJ-78190)
Author(s): W J Kunkle; R L Strohm; J B Carey
Date Published: 1980
Page Count: 52
Sponsoring Agency: National College of District Attorneys
Houston, TX 77004
Sale Source: National College of District Attorneys
College of Law
University of Houston
Houston, TX 77004
United States of America
Type: Instructional Material
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: These three papers tell prosecutors how to anticipate and counter defenses including entrapment, self-defense, consent in rape cases, alibi, and duress.
Abstract: All the papers emphasize the importance of preparation prior to the trial to allow the prosecutor to anticipate and counter defenses before or at the charging stage and to eliminate or minimize some defenses. For example, the addition of a conspiracy charge may discourage the defense of accident by allowing the introduction of hearsay statements of coconspirators when they are unavailable for trial. With regard to the self-defense argument, it is recommended that it be proved to the jury that the defendant has used excessive and unnecessary force. The relationship between the size, weight, strength, intoxication level, aggressiveness, and type of weapons used by the parties is crucial. One paper devoted solely to the alibi defense points out that often an alibi witness is deceived by the defendant into thinking that the situation about which the testimony is delivered occurred at the exact time of the commission of the crime. Thus, cross-examination should relate to the circumstances surrounding the defendant's request of the witness to testify. Relevant case law is discussed. One paper includes 74 notes containing references.
Index Term(s): Alibis; Coercive persuasion defense; Course materials; Cross-examination; Prosecutors; Reference materials; Witnesses
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.