PUBLICATIONS

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

NCJ Number:	81638

Title:	Jurisdictional Differences in Deterring Marijuana Use

Journal:	Journal of Drug Issues Volume:12 Issue:1 Dated:(Winter 1982) Pages:61-71

Author(s):	R F Meier

Date Published:	1982

Page Count:	11

Format:	Article

Language:	English

Country:	United States of America

Annotation:	Enforcement patterns are more important than the severity of the penalty in deterring marijuana use.

Abstract:	In addition, extralegal variables such as religiosity and the number of friends using marijuana are important mechanisms of social control. Self-report data came from 631 subjects in Washington, D.C., and 551 subjects in Omaha, Neb. who were part of a larger, national survey. The study compared these two jurisdictions because of their different statutory penalties for using marijuana. The penalty in Washington, D.C., was a term of confinement of up to 1 year and a fine of up to $1,000, whereas the comparable penalty in Omaha was a maximum of 7 days in jail with no fine. In both jurisdictions, legal factors were significantly related to marijuana use or nonuse. Although the legal variables accounted for a larger proportion of variance in the high penalty area, direct legal threats of arrest and jail were a greater inhibitor of marijuana use in the low penalty area. This difference may have been due to the more vigorous and conscious enforcement of the Nebraska law. In Washington, D.C., arrests for marijuana use and possession tended to result from an officer's viewing the violation than from some prior investigation. Jurisdictional comparisons represent a reasonable test of ideas about forms of social control, but they should be informed with data concerning crime patterns, methods of legal intervention, and other correlates of crime. Data tables, notes, and a list of 23 references are provided.

Index Term(s):	Deterrence; District of Columbia; Drug law enforcement; Drug use; Marijuana; Nebraska

Note:	*This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.



	To cite this abstract, use the following link: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=81638

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

Find in a Library