U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

National Conference on Alternatives to Incarceration, Boston, Massachusetts - Reels 10-11

NCJ Number
84045
Author(s)
Anonymous
Date Published
Unknown
Length
0 pages
Annotation
Two college students debate with two inmates from Massachusetts over whether prisons should be abolished. The inmates favor abolishment; the students do not.
Abstract
Prisons should be abolished because they fail to rehabilitate offenders or deter crime. Prisons turn men into homosexuals, are places of guilt and wretchedness, and encourage violence. A total of 89 percent of America's 4,100 prisons have no educational facilities and 86 percent have no recreational facilities. Massachusetts spends $14,000 a year to keep 1 prisoner locked up, and 90 percent of the State's correctional budget is spent on personnel salaries rather than on rehabilitative services. The use of prisons only to punish causes more crime, whereas community-based corrections can help rehabilitate offenders within their own communities. On the other hand, the students argue that prisons are needed to control hardcore offenders even if all social/economic inequities were abolished. A prison can be 'without walls,' but some form of containment is needed for dangerous felons. Society must still control those people who cannot abide by its rules and repeatedly harm others. The demolition of prisons will not solve the problem of protecting society from repeat offenders. Prison conditions must change, but the need for some form of prison will remain. Audience questions conclude the session.