This study examined elections for Ohio common pleas judgeships from 1962 through 1980. It found that both previously elected and appointed incumbents do very well. During the 1962-80 period, only 8 percent of the campaigns to retain common pleas judgeships resulted in primary or general election defeats. A favorable pattern of party stength or an absence of other attorneys interested in judicial office can help make the incumbent's position secure. Yet incumbents are successful even under the most unfavorable circumstance -- minority party status in large counties. Common pleas incumbents are somewhat more successful than are incumbents in many other positions. Implications of these results for both those who favor and those who oppose judicial elections are mentioned. Data tables and footnotes are supplied.