U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Mediation and Adjudication - The Double Track Approach

NCJ Number
96377
Journal
Federal Bar News and Journal Volume: 30 Issue: 11 Dated: (November 1983) Pages: 436-439
Author(s)
J Barrett
Date Published
1983
Length
4 pages
Annotation
This article examines the experience of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in formally establishing for its grant-in-aid programs a mediation service to resolve disputes already in administrative adjudication.
Abstract
On August 31, 1981, HHS issued its final rule revising the grant appeal procedures and included a new provision that sets guidelines for mediation of grant disputes. In the seven HHS mediation cases studied, four were successfully mediated. An analysis of these successful cases indicates that their resolution was primarily due to the issue being factual rather than legal. The three unsuccessful mediations suggest that if a disputed legal issue has not been resolved by the time adjudication begins, it is not likely to be resolved through mediation. The value of mediation to HHS and its possible value to other agencies is addressed, and various risks, including the erosion of regulatory rules, are considered. It is concluded that the HHS experience confirms that by formally establishing mediation as an adjunct to adjudicatory appeal procedures, a grantor agency can advance the fair and efficient disposition of grant disputes. Nineteen references and one table are disputes. Nineteen references and one table are included.