U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Long-Term Trends in Criminal Justice in the United States - How Did We Get Here? (From Proceedings of the 29th Annual Southern Conference on Corrections, P 133-147, 1984 - See NCJ-98537)

NCJ Number
98547
Author(s)
P P Lejins
Date Published
1984
Length
15 pages
Annotation
After describing the historic periods of corrections characterized by punishment, incapacitation, and rehabilitation, this paper argues for the application of a systemic model that incorporates all three aspects and goals of corrections in varying degrees according to offender characteristics and needs.
Abstract
Prior to the 18th century, corporal and capital punishment were applied to offenders along with mutilation, fines, confiscation, and banishment. In the 18th century, prisons replaced more severe corporal punishments as well as the wholesale use of capital punishment. The 19th century emphasized changing offenders through education, while the 20th century turned to the use of the behavioral sciences to rehabilitate offenders. In the mid-1960's rehabilitation was discredited by evaluation studies, and policymakers groped for a new corrections philosophy. The policy vacuum has been filled by a renewed emphasis on punishment and incapacitation, resulting in prison overcrowding. To resolve the current criminal justice policy crisis, the equal importance of punishment, incapacitation, and rehabilitation should be recognized; all three approaches should be applied to offenders according to their characteristics and needs. Research must establish which distinguishing characteristics qualify offenders for particular strategies.