U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government, Department of Justice.

NCJRS Virtual Library

The Virtual Library houses over 235,000 criminal justice resources, including all known OJP works.
Click here to search the NCJRS Virtual Library

Informing the Next Generation of Prevention Programs: CSAP's Cross-Site Evaluation of the 1994-95 High-Risk Youth Grantees

NCJ Number
174426
Journal
Journal of Community Psychology Volume: 25 Issue: 5 Dated: September 1997 Pages: 375-395
Author(s)
S Sambrano; J F Springer; J Hermann
Date Published
1997
Length
21 pages
Annotation
With more than 400 projects funded since its initiation, the High-Risk Youth (HRY) Demonstration Program of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) is a prime example of federally sponsored demonstrations for generating and disseminating policy and program lessons in the area of substance abuse prevention.
Abstract
The HRY demonstration has provided strong support for local and cross-site evaluation and plans to incorporate evaluation results into demonstration policy to encourage stronger local evaluation, more coherent program planning and management, use of the risk and resiliency approach to program design, and more comprehensive program purposes and activities. In April 1995, the Division of Knowledge Development and Evaluation within CSAP initiated the third cross-site evaluation of HRY programs using a clear conceptual framework that emphasized the risk and resiliency approach used by HRY grantees funded in 1994 and 1995. A quasiexperimental design used for 48 sites involved about 6,000 treatment and 4,000 comparison subjects. A common questionnaire was used at all sites to generate data that would support a flexible, regression-based analysis plan. In addition to contributing to the systematic development of substance abuse prevention knowledge, the CSAP cross-site evaluation of HRY programs was intended to advance understanding of the design, implementation, and use of large multisite evaluations as sources of policy learning. Evaluation results were not yet available when the article was written, but data collection and analysis procedures and barriers to cross-site evaluation are described. 21 references, 2 tables, and 1 figure