skip navigation

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 187645 Find in a Library
Title: Compensation Across Europe: A Quest for Best Practice
Journal: International Review of Victimology  Volume:7  Issue:4  Dated:2000  Pages:281-304
Author(s): Marion E. I. Brienen; Ernestine H. Hoegen
Date Published: 2000
Page Count: 24
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This article examines three models that allow the victim to claim compensation from the offender within the context of the criminal process.
Abstract: After weighing the models' respective strengths and weaknesses, and indicating how each model can be improved, the article presents a set of criteria that describe "best practice." The article examines the adhesion procedure, the compensation order, and the hybrid model. The article considers that the main stumbling block for each of the three models is the reluctance of legal practitioners to include in the course of criminal proceedings the claiming and awarding of compensation from offender to victim. "Best practice" actions, which the article claims should be observed whatever the compensation model, include: (1) informing victims of their rights; (2) simplifying procedures for claiming compensation; (3) assisting victims in making compensation claims; (4) allowing victims to address the court regarding compensation; (5) permitting court consideration of victim compensation even if an official claim has not been filed; (6) permitting the victim to appeal; (7) relaxing the rules of evidence so the court can estimate rather than calculate the exact amount of compensation; (8) considering the offender's means; and (9) collecting compensation directly by the state or by a debt collection agency on the basis of the victim's implicit permission. Notes, references
Main Term(s): Foreign courts
Index Term(s): Court procedures; Financial assistance to victims; Models; Restitution; Victim compensation; Victim services; Victimology; Victims of Crime; Victims rights
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=187645

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.