skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 210746 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Examining the Effectiveness of Boot Camps: A Randomized Experiment with a Long-Term Follow Up
Journal: Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency  Volume:42  Issue:3  Dated:August 2005  Pages:309-332
Author(s): Jean Bottcher; Michael E. Ezell
Date Published: August 2005
Page Count: 24
Type: Program/Project Evaluation
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study evaluated the long-term effectiveness of the California Youth Authority’s (CYA's) juvenile boot camp and intensive parole program, called LEAD.
Abstract: While juvenile boot camps were highly touted in the early 1990s as offering an effective alternative to traditional juvenile detention, disappointing evaluation reports and well-publicized tragedies brought up questions about the efficacy of juvenile boot camps. Unfortunately most evaluations of boot camp programs have relied on nonrandomized comparison groups and have not examined long-term outcomes. The current study drew on long-term arrest data provided by the California Department of Justice (CDOJ) in August 2002 to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of the CYA's LEAD program, which was previously evaluated in-house before complete outcome data were available. The analysis compared the arrest data of 348 LEAD participants with that of 284 control participants for approximately 7.5 years following release. Results of survival models and negative binomial regression models indicated no significant differences between the LEAD participants and control participants in terms of time to first arrest and average arrest frequency. Thus, the LEAD boot camp and its intensive aftercare program did not reduce long-term recidivism among juvenile offenders. Tables, figure, notes, references
Main Term(s): California; Juvenile program evaluation
Index Term(s): Intensive juvenile probation; Juvenile Recidivism
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.