skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 211220 
Title: Involvement of Insurance Companies in Restorative Processes (From New Directions in Restorative Justice Issues, Practice, Evaluation, P 228-241, 2005, Elizabeth Elliott and Robert M. Gordon, eds. -- See NCJ-211210)
Author(s): Melissa Ouellette
Date Published: 2005
Page Count: 14
Sponsoring Agency: Willan Publishing
Portland, OR 97213-3644
Sale Source: Willan Publishing
c/o ISBS, 5804 N.E. Hassalo Street
Portland, OR 97213-3644
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Book Chapter
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This chapter examines the implications of the involvement of insurance companies as stakeholders in restorative justice processes.
Abstract: The focus is on crimes that involve both a direct victim and the payment of a claim by an insurance company for the damage caused by an offender. Since restorative justice processes typically involve all stakeholders who have an interest in repairing harms caused by an offense, the issues raised in such cases are who are the relevant stakeholders; how the stakeholder should be involved in a restorative process; and whether corporate entities should be considered stakeholders and, if so, their proper role in a restorative process. Accepting cases in which an insurance claim could be filed may result in civil claims against the offender, who typically must admit responsibility for the harms in an offense prior to participation in restorative justice procedures. Excluding cases that involve insurance claims from restorative justice procedures, however, violates one of the principles of restorative justice, i.e., that all harms caused by the offense should be taken into account. Excluding any victimized party from the devising of strategies to remedy those harms would not be consistent with restorative justice principles. One strategy is to advise the offender of his/her right to legal advice regarding the implications of having an insurance company as a stakeholder in the restoration process. Taking full responsibility for the harm caused by the offense may include paying restitution to the insurance company in addition to making amends to the direct victim. If the offender agrees, a conference or mediation could be arranged with the offender and the insurance company. 14 notes and 35 references
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Accountability; Insurance claim investigations; Mediation; Restitution; Restorative Justice
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.