skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 213608 Find in a Library
Title: Economics of Juvenile Jurisdiction
Author(s): John Roman; Jeffrey A. Butts
Corporate Author: The Urban Institute
United States of America

Chapin Hall Ctr for Children at the University of Chigago
United States of America
Date Published: August 2005
Page Count: 33
Sponsoring Agency: Chapin Hall Ctr for Children at the University of Chigago
Chicago, IL 60637
MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile Justice
Philadelphia, PA 19122
The Urban Institute
Washington, DC 20037
Sale Source: The Urban Institute
2100 M Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Based on the conclusions of the Research Roundtable on Estimating the Costs and Benefits of the Separate Juvenile Justice System, this paper examines the economic costs and benefits of having a separate system for juvenile offenders compared with processing them in the criminal court system.
Abstract: The paper concludes that the benefits of incrementally processing greater numbers of serious juvenile offenders in adult criminal courts may exceed the costs if it leads to more certain and longer incapacitation of those juveniles most likely to commit dangerous and expensive crimes. Such benefits would be undermined, however, if the costs of implementing such a policy outweighed the benefit of more and longer incapacitation. One such cost might be "net-widening," which would involve bringing more relatively minor juvenile offenders into the adult system and increase their numbers in prisons. Also, if the increasing number of juveniles being processed in the adult system were to reduce the quality of processing adult offenders, then the cost of the adult processing of juveniles could exceed the benefits to the community. The costs would be greatest if the transferred juveniles imprisoned posed less risk to the community than adult offenders diverted to supervision in the community. Crime costs for the community are greatest when offenders commit violent crimes, expensive property crimes, or a large number of crimes. Any jurisdictional change in the processing of juveniles will only yield a net benefit if this leads to more incapacitation or effective rehabilitation of offenders most likely to commit such crimes. This will happen only if the extra costs of arresting, trying, and treating or sentencing such offenders are less than the savings achieved from reducing the severity and number of crimes they commit. This paper describes a cost-benefit methodology for making these estimations. 1 figure and 45 references
Main Term(s): Juvenile justice policies
Index Term(s): Cost/Benefit Analysis; Juvenile court waiver; Juvenile justice system; Juvenile processing; Research methods
Note: Downloaded March 28, 2006.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.