skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 242303 Find in a Library
Title: Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission Youth Reentry Improvement Report
Corporate Author: Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission
United States of America
Date Published: November 2011
Page Count: 80
Sponsoring Agency: Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission
Springfield, IL 62701
Sale Source: Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission
815-823 East Monroe Street
Springfield, IL 62701
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The Illinois Juvenile Justice Commission (IJJC) presents its findings on the current systemic failures of the State’s juvenile justice reentry system.
Abstract: The IJJC concludes that the current release decisionmaking process for youth undermines the rehabilitation and public safety goals of the Illinois juvenile justice system. Release is largely dictated by a youth’s committing offense and alleged disciplinary violations while incarcerated. It should be determined by an informed, objective determination that it is in the best interest of the youth and the public for the youth to be released. In addition, there is no independent review mechanism that assesses or documents the youth’s rehabilitative progress and the appropriateness of continued incarceration. Further, parole conditions that restrict movement, prohibit activities, and mandate programs or services are established without evidence that they are needed and without support to encourage their completion. Another major finding is that youths’ constitutional due process protections are violated by the basic structure and process of Prisoner Review Board revocation proceedings. The IJJC also determined that the current parole system, which is operated by the Department of Corrections’ adult parole division, is costly and ineffective at sustaining prosocial behaviors, enhancing public safety, and reducing recidivism. In addition, the IJJC concludes that the Department of Juvenile Justice youth tracking software is antiquated and fails to manage effectively youth assessments, programming progress, and public safety monitoring. Three recommendations for reform are offered by the IJJC. First, youth must be prepared for timely release, and qualified members of the Prisoner Review Board must increase the frequency and quality of release hearings. Second, the current adult parole surveillance model for juveniles should be replaced by a statewide extension of the Department of Juvenile Justice’s Aftercare Specialist pilot program. Third, a court must make parole revocation determinations. Appended supplementary data and information
Main Term(s): Juvenile Aftercare
Index Term(s): Aftercare decisionmaking; Aftercare/juvenile parole; Illinois; Juvenile parole agencies; Juvenile parole services; Parole board discretion; Parole conditions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.