skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 249177 Find in a Library
Title: Preventing Sexual Violence: Can Examination of Offense Location Inform
Journal: International Journal of Law and Psychiatry  Volume:34  Issue:3  Dated:May-June 2011  Pages:160-167
Author(s): Nicole Colombino; Cynthia Calkins Mercado; Jill Levenson; Elizabeth Jeglic
Date Published: June 2011
Page Count: 8
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2007-IJ-CX-0037
Document: HTML
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study examined locations where sex offenders first come into contact with their victims and whether sex crime locations differ among those who perpetrate offenses against children compared with those who commit offenses against adults; this study also examined actuarial risk scores and recidivism rates among offenders who met victims in child-dense public locations to determine whether these offenders are more at risk of reoffending.
Abstract: Recently, legislative initiatives to prevent sex-crime recidivism include the passage of child safety zones ( also called loitering zones) that prohibit sex offenders from lingering near places where children congregate. The ability of policies such as these or residence restriction to curb sexual recidivism depends on the empirical reality of sex offender perpetration patterns. In the current study, descriptive analyses based on archival sex offender file review (n = 1,557), revealed that offenders primarily committed their offenses in private residences (67 percent). Relatively few offenders (4.4 percent) contacted their victims in child-dense public locations. Also, offenders who perpetrated crimes against children were more likely to meet victims within a residence, and those who perpetrated crimes against adults were more likely to encounter victims in a more public location (e.g., bar or workplace). Although only 3.7 percent of all offenders in this sample sexually reoffended, those who reoffended were more likely to have met their victim in a child-dense public location than those who did not reoffend. Current sex crime policies that focus only on where offenders live may fail to focus on where offenders go and also may misdirect efforts away from the place where sex crimes most often occur, i.e., in the home. (Publisher abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Crime prevention measures
Index Term(s): Child Molestation; Child molesters; Comparative analysis; Crime patterns; Crime specific countermeasures; Criminal methods; Location; Location specific crime; NIJ grant-related documents; NIJ Resources; Recidivism; Recidivism statistics; Residential Restrictions for Sex Offenders; Sex offenders
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.