skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 249509 Find in a Library
Title: Electronic Monitoring: Draft National Standard for Offender Tracking Systems Addresses Common Stakeholder Needs
Corporate Author: US Government Accountability Office
United States of America
Date Published: October 2015
Page Count: 39
Sponsoring Agency: US Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548
Sale Source: US Government Accountability Office
441 G Street, NW
Washington, DC 20548
United States of America
Document: HTML|PDF
Type: Standard; Test/Measurement
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents the findings and methodology of the U.S. Government Accountability Office’s (GAO’s) review of the U.S. Justice Department’s National Institute of Justice’s (NIJ’s) approach for developing the standard for offender tracking systems (OTS).
Abstract: The report examines the extent to which NIJ collaborated with stakeholders in developing the standard and whether the standard and guide address stakeholder needs and challenges. The review found that NIJ collaborated with a variety of criminal justice and technical experts in developing a draft standard for OTS; however, earlier involvement of manufacturers could have expedited its development by providing insights on OTS capabilities and limitations at the outset of its use in criminal justice practice. Coordination has improved since 2012, and manufacturers’ major concerns have been addressed. NIJ’s draft standard includes requirements for common operational and circumvention-detection needs. In addition, the draft guide provides information and guidance related to challenges identified by the criminal justice agencies with which GAO met, as well as other considerations for implementing an OTS program. These challenges include misconceptions among the public and victims that OTS allows agencies to prevent bad behavior before it happens; the development of appropriate protocols for responding to OTS alerts; and workload issues, such as whether there is sufficient staff or resources to respond to OTS alerts 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Also, in recognition of the range of agencies, resources, and objectives of offender tracking, the guide provides information and guidance, but does not offer “One size fits all” solutions to various OTS challenges. The GAO review interviewed stakeholders associated with a non-generalizable sample of 10 criminal justice agencies that use OTS. 2 tables and 8 figures
Main Term(s): Corrections standards
Index Term(s): Electronic monitoring of offenders; Equipment evaluation; Intensive supervision programs; Surveillance equipment
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.