skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 249894 Find in a Library
Title: Comparative Evaluation of Court-Based Responses to Offenders With Mental Illnesses
Author(s): Matthew Epperson; Arthur Lurigio
Date Published: May 2016
Page Count: 12
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2010-IJ-CX-0033
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Program/Project Evaluation; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In order to address various criticisms of evaluations of recent efforts by the justice system to improve services to offenders with serious mental illness (SMI), the current study used a mixed methods comparative evaluation of three established court-based programs that serve offenders with SMI, i.e., a mental health court, specialized probation, and standard probation.
Abstract: The evaluation focused on each program’s structure, operation, and effectiveness. The overall conclusion of this evaluation is that court-based alternatives to incarceration for offenders with SMI show some promise in improving recidivism outcomes; however, many challenges remain, including improving probation engagement and completion. Local programs that can develop a range of programs and service intensity will have better capacity to address the multiple needs of offenders with SMI. This evaluation found that approximately half of probationers with SMI in specialized programs failed to complete probation successfully; and unsuccessful termination was significantly associated with subsequent arrest and incarceration across programs. Although post-probation recidivism was common, frequency of arrest and length of incarceration post-program was significantly lower for probationers with SMI who completed any of the three programs successfully. Probation officers used a range of techniques in supervising SMI probationers. Relational factors in the interaction between probation officers and staff were apparently influential in probationers’ receptiveness to probation supervision, participation in mental health treatment, and engagement in the process of behavioral change. Probationers’ participation in the mental health court (MHC) reported higher quality relationships than standard probationers. The study was conducted in Cook County, IL. Data were collected from three sources: in-depth interviews with 26 probation officers and staff from the three programs; in-depth interviews with 98 SMI probationers and their completion of the Dual Role Relationship Inventory - Revised; and administrative data on 864 individuals who exited the three programs in 2008 or 2009. 2 tables
Main Term(s): Mental Health Courts
Index Term(s): Alternatives to Incarceration; Comparative analysis; Illinois; Mentally ill offenders; NIJ final report; NIJ Resources; Probation casework; Probation effectiveness; Probation evaluation; Probation management; Probation officer attitudes; Probation or parole services; Program evaluation; Recidivism; Recidivism statistics
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.