skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 250351 Find in a Library
Title: Learning About Probation From Client Perspectives: Feedback from Probationers Served by Adult Redeploy Illinois-Funded Program Models
Author(s): Caitlin DeLong; Jessica Reichert
Corporate Author: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority
United States of America
Date Published: August 2016
Page Count: 67
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
Washington, DC 20531
Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority
Chicago, IL 60606
Grant Number: 2012-DJ-BX-0203; 2010-DJ-BX-0015; 2009-SU-B9-005; 2009-DJ-BX-0023; 2008-DJ-BX-0034
Sale Source: Bureau of Justice Assistance
US Dept of Justice
Office of Justice Programs
810 Seventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Grants and Funding; Program/Project Evaluation; Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents findings and methodology of a study that interviewed clients of Illinois local evidence-based programs intended to reduce the number of nonviolent offenders sentenced to prison.
Abstract: The study interviewed 108 clients enrolled in 10 prison-diversion programs that used three program models, i.e., drug courts, intensive supervision probation with services (ISP-S), and the Hawaii Opportunity Probation With Enforcement (HOPE). The interviews consisted of questions about demographics, program staff, program operations, and services. Regarding probation conditions, most interviewees thought the conditions of their probation were clear (81 percent); 97 percent were required to be drug tested, and most were required to pay court costs (75 percent) and attend drug treatment (69 percent). Of 64 probationers who received a sanction for noncompliance, most said it was “very likely” that they would be caught if they violated probation conditions; 5 percent said the sanctions were fair, and 72 percent said they were immediate. Sanctions and incentives that are swift, certain, and fair are crucial to all three models of supervision. Overall, clients agreed with positive statements about their probation, such as the program helped them, positively impacted their future, and believed probation was better for them than other sanctions, namely imprisonment. Many probationers reported needing, but not receiving, housing, identification items, healthcare services, public assistance, and job support. Implications of these findings for policy and practice are discussed. 13 tables, 77 references, and appended interview questions and data tables
Main Term(s): Corrections effectiveness
Index Term(s): BJA Grant-related Documents; BJA Resources; Evidence-Based Programs; Illinois; Nonviolent behavior; Offender attitudes; Probation casework; Probation conditions; Probation effectiveness; Probation management; Probation or parole services; Probation violations; Probationers
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.