skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 250369 Find in a Library
Title: Fostering Innovation in the U.S. Court System: Identifying High-Priority Technology and Other Needs for Improving Court Operations and Outcomes
Author(s): Brian A. Jackson; Duren Banks; John S. Hollywood; Dulani Woods; Amanda Royal; Patrick W. Woodson; Nicole J. Johnson
Corporate Author: Rand Corporation
United States of America
Date Published: 2016
Page Count: 165
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Rand Corporation
Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 2013-MU-CX-K003
Publication Number: ISBN 978-0-8330-9535;-0
Sale Source: US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
810 Seventh Street, NW
Washington, DC 20531
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Grant Sponsored); Report (Study/Research); Report (Technical Assistance); Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Document; Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report presents the results of the Courts Advisory Panel, a group convened in fiscal year 2015 as part of the National Institute of Justice’s (NIJ’s) National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center (NLECTC) system for the purpose of identifying current challenges and innovation needs in the U.S. court system.
Abstract: The findings presented in this report should be of interest primarily to organizations and individuals involved in technology planning, research funding, and product development related to the U.S. court system. The Courts Advisory Panel was composed of judges, prosecutors, defense counsel, and court administrators from across the country. Using a structured brainstorming process, the Panel identified the problems courts currently face and the resources courts need to address these problems. The Panel’s initial list of just over 130 needs covered a wide range of issues, from technology and training to changes in legislation and shifts in funding models for the courts. The list of needs was equally split between two broad areas: 1) needs related to information and communications (including both information technology and the application of data collection, analysis, and other tools); and 2) innovations in doctrine and knowledge regarding the courts’ governing policies and how the courts perform their tasks. Relatively few of the needs were related to court facilities. The needs were first broken into three tiers based on the combination of their value and likelihood of success, and then needs meeting the definition of high value or “low-hanging fruit” were identified. 17 figures, 11 tables, approximately 200 references, and appended Panel members, pre-meeting questionnaire, Panel agenda, and detailed methodology
Main Term(s): Court management
Index Term(s): Court information systems; Needs assessment; NIJ grant-related documents; NIJ Resources; Organization development; Technology transfer
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.