skip navigation


Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 250386 Find in a Library
Title: Building an Innovation Agenda for Corrections
Journal: Corrections Today  Dated:September/October 2015  Pages:20-21
Author(s): Joseph Russo; Doris Wells
Date Published: October 2016
Page Count: 2
Document: PDF
Type: Instructional Material; Technical Assistance
Format: Document (Online)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article reviews the findings and methodology of a NIJ-funded study conducted by the RAND Corporation and the University of Denver (“Fostering Innovation in Community and Institutional Corrections: Identifying High-Priority Technology and Other Needs for the U.S. Corrections Sector”), which discusses and prioritizes innovations that address problems now facing the corrections sector.
Abstract: The study first conducted a literature review on the challenges facing corrections, available technologies, and needs assessments. Researchers also received input from a corrections advisory panel, which was a group of 25 knowledgeable and experienced correctional professionals from across the Nation. The advisory panel prioritized approximately 200 needs based on a few selected measures. First, the needs were scored based on how they contributed to one or more correctional objectives. Needs that contributed to more important objectives were ranked higher. Next, panelists ranked each need across two dimensions: the probability that the need, if implemented, would effectively address the problem and the probability that the need would be broadly adopted by agencies. The measures were scored and the needs ranked in tiers. Some of the top-tier needs included risk-assessment needs; contraband-related needs involving the entrance of prohibited items into correctional facilities and their use by inmates; offender mental health needs; language differences between correctional staff and offenders they supervise; the release of higher risk offenders into the community to reduce jail and prison overcrowding; and the dedication of more resources to community-based agencies. The innovation agenda developed is intended as an initial step in the process of identifying the needs of the corrections community as viewed by criminal justice policymakers and practitioners.
Main Term(s): Correctional planning
Index Term(s): Correctional staff needs assessment; Corrections management; Corrections Technology; Corrections training needs assessment; Needs assessment
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.