skip navigation

Justinfo Subscribe to Stay Informed

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Document Details

JUSTINFO

Subscribe to Stay Informed
Want to be in the know? JUSTINFO is a biweekly e-newsletter containing information about new publications, events, training, funding opportunities, and Web-based resources available from the NCJRS Federal sponsors. Sign up to get JUSTINFO in your inbox.

How to Obtain Documents

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Click the "Download" button on the Search Results page.

 

NCJ Number: 46712 Find in a Library
Title: NEGOTIATED JUSTICE - PRESSURES TO PLEAD GUILTY
Author(s): J BALDWIN; M MCCONVILLE; C M CAMPBELL; P WILES
Corporate Author: Martin Robertson and Co Ltd
United Kingdom
Date Published: 1977
Page Count: 144
Sponsoring Agency: Martin Robertson and Co Ltd
London, N 1 8HL, England
Sale Source: Martin Robertson and Co Ltd
17 Quick Street
London, N 1 8HL,
United Kingdom
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: THE SOCIAL AND LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF INDUCING DEFENDANTS TO PLEAD GUILTY IN THE INTERESTS OF ADMINISTRATIVE EFFICIENCY IS STUDIED IN THE BRITISH COURT SYSTEM.
Abstract: THE EVIDENCE GATHERED FROM PERSONAL INTERVIEWS WITH 121 DEFENDENTS IN THE BIRMINGHAM (ENGLAND) COURT SYSTEM STRONGLY SUGGESTS THAT MANY OF THE DEFENDANTS WHO WERE EITHER INNOCENT OR UNLIKELY TO BE CONVICTED WERE PRESSURED BY THEIR DEFENSE COUNSEL TO PLEAD GUILTY. WHILE THE LAWYERS' BEHAVIOR IS CRITICIZED, THE MAIN DEFECTS HIGHLIGHTED BY THE STUDY LIE IN THE STRUCTURE OF THE LEGAL PROCESS ITSELF, PRIMARILY IN THE LACK OF ADEQUATE SAFEGUARDS FOR THE ACCUSED WHEN UNDER INITIAL POLICE INTERROGATION AND IN THE CONSIDERABLE REDUCTION IN SENTENCE OFTEN GIVEN AS AN INDUCEMENT TO PLEAD GUILTY. THE AUTHORS MAINTAIN THAT THE INJUSTICES ENCOUNTERED IN THEIR RESEARCH ARE PRODUCED BY A SYSTEM WHICH GIVES TOO LITTLE PROTECTION TO THE INNOCENT AND TOO OFTEN SACRIFICES THE NEEDS OF THE DEFENDANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF BUREAUCRATIC EFFICIENCY. THE RESULTS OF THIS STUDY WERE HIGHLY CONTROVERSIAL, AND WERE OPPOSED BY THE BRITISH BAR. NOTES AND REFERENCES FOLLOW EACH CHAPTER. A BIBLIOGRAPHY AND TABULAR DATA ARE INCLUDED. CITED COURT CASES ARE LISTED. (DJM)
Index Term(s): Court system; Defendants; Defense counsel; Foreign police/community relations; Great Britain/United Kingdom; Plea negotiations; Pleas
Note: LAW IN SOCIETY SERIES
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=46712

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's Web site is provided.
Tell us how you use the Library and the Abstracts Database. Send us your Feedback.