Written by judges, academics, professionals, and a layperson, the articles generally express critical perspectives on Australian drug laws, their manner of enforcement, and their judicial application. Most articles make reference to the spirit of public distress over the 'drug problem' about which there is a great deal of misinformation, as well as to the role of the media in perpetuating these attitudes. Commonly faulted in these articles are the provisions of the major Australian drug laws -- the Commonwealth's Narcotic Drugs Act and the Customs Act -- for their insufficient distinctions between cannabis and heroin offenses and the manner in which penalties for these offenses continue to be increased without other Government efforts to ameliorate the drug problem on a comprehensive, socially relevant basis. Other criticism leveled at policymakers is the failure to implement recommendations made by a variety of study commissions, which have emphasized the need for treatment programs for addicts, decriminalization of marijuana, and controls over the abuse of publicly accepted habit-forming substances such as alcohol and tobacco. Specific articles focus on a judge's description of his caseload and decisionmaking practices in sentencing drug offenders, as well as scholars' reviews of the history of Australian drug legislation, the relationship between drug addiction and crime and the validity of defense arguments using intoxication to disclaim criminal responsibility. Some articles include tabular data. For individual articles, see NCJ 77574-77580.